Tag Archives: borrower

For every Action an Equal and Opposite Transaction

Accounting ledgers are great.

They show how books balance.

This is what double entry book keeping is all about.

So where did the “Mortgage” funds come from?

For a “Loan” to take place there must be a draw down in one account to transfer to another.

Also any “Deposit” will increase a ledger.

So please, to all you highly qualified ACCA and CIMA accountants out there with a “Mortgage”…

get your calculators and spreadsheets out and show us the money!!!

When you get to grips with what is really going on you will confirm that YOU are the originating creditor.

 

#VOIDMORTGAGE

Would you do this?

Would you fill in an application form for a loan …

and then give a bank your money only for them to give it back and call it a loan?

Oh and then they charge you interest on your money?

Oh and pledge the house that you thought that you just bought?

No, you wouldn’t would you, or we would like to think that 11.2 million people in the country wouldn’t either.

Would you believe it for one moment that this in all likelihood is happening every time a “Loan” is carried out?

There may well be some tiny differences to this in practice but this is what is really happening.

Quite simply…Why would you borrow your own Money?

This would be classed as Mutual Intent. You never intended to borrow your own Money.

Stayed tuned for more info like this.

 

#VOIDMORTGAGE

 

 

Something for Nothing?

Money out of thin air?

Well it would appear they (the banks) cannot just do that.

There must be something to monetise in the first place.

Where can these items be verified?

Bank Of England state as per their quarterly bulletins
Quarterly Bulletin 2008 Q1 Volume 48 No. 1
Steve Baker MP house of commons debate and Hansard

Steve Baker MP at the historic debate in UK Parliament on Money Creation

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/backbench-business-committee/news/mps-debate-money-creation-and-society/

The full text of the debate is here

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmhansrd/cm141120/debtext/141120-0001.htm#14112048000001

and here http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmhansrd/cm141120/debtext/141120-0002.htm
These are verifiable statements on the record in the public domain.

We need to look at how the equitable arrangements of a mortgage come about.

If it can be proved as a fact that zero loan existed when your freehold was purchased, how can the alleged lender make any claim AT ALL?

What is the most that an alleged lender can claim?

Even using case law that they can take the house back before the ink is dry? (link required)

We would suggest that in “Equity” this figure could be a MAXIMUM of 50% of any alleged loan and then 100% if in fact a loan did actually take place with facts, evidence and full accounting.

This is based on an exchange of items or a swap. Your paperwork for their advance.

Where someone has been in their home for 10 years with a £100,000 “Mortgage” paying £500 per months they may have fallen behind by 2 months payments.

This is enough for the alleged lender to take possession proceedings.

As Loyd Grossman would say…..” Lets have a look at the evidence!”

If NO LOAN takes place, then any “Money” (credit) that came out of thin air because someone wrote something on a piece of paper, who is entitled to make a claim and for what?

This is where we get our 50% from. A swap or exchange of two items having the same value but a different specie of “MONEY”.

Paying the £500 per month soon tots up. That is £6000 per year and after 10 years £60,000.
The £120,000 house is now probably worth £200,000.

The alleged lender now claims that due to the fact you have not paid TWO months of £500, they want “their” house back.

In equity, where are we with this and the accounting?

I’m guessing that you already worked out that you put in quite a bit more than the bank.

Even IF they made any loan at all!

 

#VOIDMORTGAGE

Presumption of a “Loan”

Many people think that a “mortgage” is a loan of money to buy their house.

This is the problem with presumptions.

Terminology is everything.

A “Hoover” is a tradename for a vacuum cleaner, therefore not all vacuum cleaners are “Hoovers”.

What is a Loan?

A “Loan” is normally one of 2 things.

1) Something you do or supply for free, normally to a friend who will return the thing,money or the favour.

2)The other is a commercial activity where the “Loan” has conditions attached, normally a contract and where you pay a commercial rate for the provision of a “Loan”

 

A Loan could be described as the particular loss of an asset for a period of time until it is returned, with or without any commercial rates attached.

For a Loan to have taken place therefore:

The amount “Loaned” MUST cause a deficit in the accounting of the “LENDER”

If this simple transaction does not occur it therefore cannot be classified as a “LOAN”