Tag Archives: promise to pay

Articles, Police Constables

Hundreds of police officers sign open letter …

More than 600 serving police officers have signed a damning open letter warning another Tory-led government will “further endanger public safety” and leave the force “perilously close to collapse”.

It is the biggest ever criticism of government policy by frontline officers – despite them being banned from taking an active part in politics.

And it will further undermine David Cameron’s Tories’ credibility as the party of law and order.

The unprecedented intervention came in response to the coalition Government slashing the police budget by around 26% over the last five years, at a cost of 35,000 officers.

The letter states: “The police service is in crisis. Numbers are falling. Experienced officers are leaving (or planning to leave) in their droves.”

And it claims cuts to the force “will send a negative message about Britain being a safe place to live and do business and it will put economic recovery at risk”.

Former Met Det Chief Insp Peter Kirkham wrote the letter after reading one by business leaders outlining their concerns about a Labour government coming to power.

The letter has been signed by more than 1,000 policing professionals, including retired officers and police staff. Among them are 423 PCs and DCs, 188 sergeants, 50 inspectors up to Det Chief Insp level and four superintendents.

But senior officers have condemned the letter. Gareth Morgan, Avon and Somerset temporary Deputy Chief Constable, tweeted: “My advice to all serving officers would be to stay well clear of campaigns and lobbying. It’s the law after all.”

Full article and letter at http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hundreds-police-officers-sign-open-5562385

 

It would be nice if Constables stood shoulder to shoulder with rest of us when a house is stolen.

It will be too late when all the forces are privatised and many of you lose your jobs and then your home …

 

#VOIDMORTGAGE

 

 

Accountants, Bank/Building Society Staff, Money Creation, Police Constables, Solicitors & Barristers, Something to think about ...

For every Action an Equal and Opposite Transaction

Accounting ledgers are great.

They show how books balance.

This is what double entry book keeping is all about.

So where did the “Mortgage” funds come from?

For a “Loan” to take place there must be a draw down in one account to transfer to another.

Also any “Deposit” will increase a ledger.

So please, to all you highly qualified ACCA and CIMA accountants out there with a “Mortgage”…

get your calculators and spreadsheets out and show us the money!!!

When you get to grips with what is really going on you will confirm that YOU are the originating creditor.

 

#VOIDMORTGAGE

Money Creation

Offer of Loan vs Contract to be in Debt?

Which one do you believe you entered into?

What do all your offer documents refer to?

What are the elements of THE contract or YOUR deed?

If all the elements of a contract do exist then the actual content of those documents will form the primae facie case that should be put forward in any claim against you.

What is it therefore that is ACTUALLY being claimed from you?

If you had an offer of a loan where is the evidence of that completion of the contract and the bargaining that took place?

Or were you offered a deed whereby that you may have been misled by your agent which is in fact a contract to be in debt for an amount of money and this is backed up by a security placed on the property.

This being known as a type of disposition called a mortgage.

The paperwork will speak for itself if you can prove produce and identify all the elements.

You see, anyone can do a good deed for another, some may even sign a deed to confirm they will do it …

CONTRACT OR DEED?

 

 

#VOIDMORTGAGE

Money Creation

MONEY VS MONIES WORTH

MONEY VS MONIES WORTH?

What does this mean and what were you actually loaned?

It really is as different as apples and pears.

If someone wanted some apples and could only complete the bargain by providing pears then that exchange would be complete. (If accepted of course.)

If you wanted apples but completed the bargain with “Money”(1) then that exchange would be complete.

In both scenarios the person had to have the apples.

If you go to the Post Office to get your Euros you pay over “Money” (1).

That exchange is complete as you agreed to it but the PO took a cut for providing the service of “Exchange” (3).

In this case the PO had to have the Euro’s.

If you wanted “Credit” (2) and the only thing you had access to was a “Promise to pay” (3).

When do you think this transaction completes the bargain?
So what happens when you get a “Mortgage” (4)?

You think that someone is going to lend you the money that they have and you agree to paying this money back with interest because that is how it is in a commercial transaction.

For a contract or agreement to take place there has to be a number of elements.

If you thought that “Money” (1) was being lent, as opposed to be advanced “Credit” (2) would you have had the same intent or could it be argued that “Mutual Intent” (5) never existed in the transaction for the bargain to complete?

(1) Money =
(2) Credit =
(3) Exchange =
(4) Mortgage =
(5) Mutual Intent =
(6) Monies Worth =

Therefore in what circumstances does Money EQUAL Monies worth?

Answers on a postcard …